I suppose selling your business for almost 2 billion dollars is great but does this make your invention worthy of being the Invention of the Year from Time Magazine? There have been many video sharing sites over the years and YouTube can be considered if anything to be a copycat on many levels. Do the Time Magazine people just don’t get it? Here is a good blog post explaining why YouTube should (or should not) win this coveted award.
But really, do you think at this point the founders of YouTube really care one way or another? These guys are probably glued to MarketWatch all day tracking Google’s stock price.
Here is the story from USA Today.